نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت، مؤسسه آموزش عالی امام جواد (ع)، یزد، ایران.

2 گروه مدیریت اجرایی، شرکت برق منطقه‌ای یزد، یزد، ایران.

3 گروه مدیریت، واحد دهاقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، دهاقان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: یکی از بهترین رویکردهای مدیریت خلاقیت، الگوی خلاقیت آمابیل می‌باشد، این الگو ضعف‌هایی دارد که محققین را بر آن داشت تا با استفاده از پرسشنامه استاندارد ارزیابی جو خلاقیت سازمانی آمابیل و سنجش خلاقیت سازمانی به ارایه مدلی جدید در جهت توسعه مدل خلاقیت سازمانی آمابیل بپردازند.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: پژوهش از نوع توصیفی و مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری است. جامعه آماری آن تمامی شرکت‌های زیرمجموعه صنعت موردمطالعه و پرسشنامه 78 سوالی توسط 392 نفر تکمیل شد. برای طراحی مدل از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی و مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و Smart PLS استفاده شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های حاصل از سنجش خلاقیت، از روش‌های توصیفی و همچنین میانگین وزنی و آزمون فریدمن استفاده گردید.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های این تحقیق در چهار سرفصل ارایه شده است. سه سرفصل اول مربوط به توسعه مدل خلاقیت سازمانی آمابیل می‌باشد. سرفصل چهارم به سنجش خلاقیت سازمانی در سطح صنعت موردمطالعه پرداخته که نتایج حاصله وضعیت خلاقیت سازمانی را در سطح متوسط نزدیک به بالا ارزیابی کرده است.
اصالت/ارزش‌افزوده علمی: از بین عامل‌های شش‌گانه خلاقیت سازمانی وضعیت دو عامل بهره‌وری واحد و حمایت واحد/گروه کاری نسبت به بقیه عامل‌ها بهتر و در سطح متوسط روبه بالا ارزیابی‌شده و وضعیت دو عامل خلاقیت و حمایت سازمانی نسبت به بقیه عامل‌ها کمی ضعیف‌تر ارزیابی شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing model and evaluating the organizational creativity of government organizations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abolfazl Sherafat 1
  • Farahnaz Karimi 2
  • Sayyed Mohammad Reza Davoodi 3

1 Department of Management, Imam Javad Higher Education Institute, Yazd, Iran.

2 Department of Executive Management, Yazd Regional Electric Company, Yazd, Iran.

3 Department of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose: One of the best approaches to creative management is the Amabel creativity model, which has weaknesses that prompted researchers to use a standard questionnaire to assess the atmosphere of Amabel's organizational creativity and measure organizational creativity to provide a new model for developing the Amabel organizational creativity model.
Methodology: The research is descriptive and structural equation modeling. Its statistical population was completed by 392 people in all companies under the industry and 78 questionnaires. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling using SPSS and Smart PLS software were used to design the model. Descriptive methods, as well as the weighted mean and Friedman test, were used to analyze the data obtained from the creativity test.
Findings: The findings are presented in four topics. The first three topics are related to the development of the organizational creativity model of Amabile. The fourth chapter assesses organizational creativity at the level of the industry under study, which evaluates the results of organizational creativity at a medium to near level.
Originality/Value: Among the six factors of organizational creativity, the status of the two factors of unit productivity and single/working group support was evaluated better and higher than the other factors and the status of the two factors of creativity and organizational support was slightly weaker than other factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational creativity
  • Develop a creativity model
  • Amabile's model of creativity
Amabile, T. (2011). Componential theory of creativity (pp. 538-559). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 157-183.
Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). User's guide for keys: assessing the climate for creativity. Retrieved from https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=7422
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
Antony, J. P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of smes—part 2: an empirical study on SMEs in India. Measuring business excellence, 14, 42-52.
Basadur, M. (1997). Organizational development interventions for enhancing creativity in the workplace. The journal of creative behavior, 31(1), 59-72.
Bharadwaj, S., & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both?. Journal of product innovation management: an international publication of the product development & management association, 17(6), 424-434.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.
Csikszent, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge University Press.
Darvishmotevali, M., Altinay, L., & Köseoglu, M. A. (2020). The link between environmental uncertainty, organizational agility, and organizational creativity in the hotel industry. International journal of hospitality management, 87, 102499.
De Vasconcellos, S. L., Garrido, I. L., & Parente, R. C. (2019). Organizational creativity as a crucial resource for building international business competence. International business review, 28(3), 438-449.
Dwyer, P. (2016). Managing creativity in media organisations. In Managing media firms and industries (pp. 343-365). Springer, Cham.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of management review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
Gong, Y., Zhou, J., & Chang, S. (2013). Core knowledge employee creativity and firm performance: the moderating role of riskiness orientation, firm size, and realized absorptive capacity. Personnel psychology, 66(2), 443-482.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ [etc.]. Pearson Prentice Hall, New York, NY: Macmillan, 24, 899.
Isaksen, S. G., & Ekvall, G. (2010). Managing for innovation: the two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and innovation management, 19(2), 73-88.
Karatepe, O. M., Ozturk, A., & Kim, T. T. (2019). Servant leadership, organisational trust, and bank employee outcomes. The service industries journal, 39(2), 86-108.
Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of management studies, 44(7), 1187-1212.
Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Psychology Press.
Mahi Jaghargh, A., Rashidi, M. M., Zabihi, M. R., & Taghsimi, J. (2019). Design and evaluation of intellectual capitals model in Mashhad universities of medical sciences with emphasis on the role of organizational creativity. Journal of north Khorasan University of medical sciences, 10(4), 100-108.
Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity research journal, 16(1), 119-140.
Mikdashi, T. (1999). Constitutive meaning and aspects of work environment affecting creativity in Lebanon. Participation and empowerment: an international journal, 7(3), 47-55.
Mirghafouri S. H., Moravej S., & Sadeqi Arani Z. A framework for forecasting organizational creativity and innovation based on knowledge-centered practices using artificial neural networks case study: selected public organizations in Yazd province. JMDP 2013, 25(4), 45-68. (In Persian). DOI: 20.1001.1.17350719.1391.25.4.2.7  
Moghimi, S. M., Rahbar, ‌ A. H., & Islami, H. (2007). Organizational spirituality and its impact on employee creativity. Journal of ethics in science and technology, second year, 3, 4. 89-98. (In Persian). Magiran.com/p636440
Mohamed, M. S., Khalifa, G. S., Al-Shibami, A. H., Alrajawi, I., & Isaac, O. (2019). The mediation effect of innovation on the relationship between creativity and organizational productivity: an empirical study within public sector organizations in the UAE. Journal of engineering and applied sciences, 14(10), 3234-3242.
Mostafa, M. (2005). Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisations: an empirical investigation. Journal of management development, 24(1), 7-33.
Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural euation modeling. Springer.
Runco, M. A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: commemorating Guilford's 1950 presidential address. Creativity research journal, 13(3-4), 245-245.
Salehi, B. M. H., Kazemi, M., & Khorakian, A. (2014). A framework for assessing and developing the ability of innovation through a system dynamics approach). Quarterly journal of technology development management, 2(2), 47-78. (In Persian). DOI: 10.22104/jtdm.2015.137
Sundgren, M., Dimenäs, E., Gustafsson, J. E., & Selart, M. (2005). Drivers of organizational creativity: a path model of creative climate in pharmaceutical R&D. R&D management, 35(4), 359-374.
Terouhid, S. A., & Ries, R. (2016). People capability: a strategic capability for enhancing organizational excellence of construction firms. Journal of modelling in management, 11(3), pp. 811-841.
Tseng, H. M., & Liu, F. C. (2011). Assessing the climate for creativity (KEYS): confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric examination of a T aiwan version. International journal of selection and assessment, 19(4), 438-441.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.
Yang, J. S., & Hung, H. V. (2015). Emotions as constraining and facilitating factors for creativity: companionate love and anger. Creativity and innovation management, 24(2), 217-230.
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2008). Handbook of organizational creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York.